The confrontation between Jesus and the scholar is almost as important as the parable that follows. The Gospel, as formatted for the Catholic church, even starts with the introduction of the scholar, not by establishing where Jesus was or what He'd been teaching. The focus is on this guy who clearly thinks he's pretty clever.
Note the wording of the Gospel:
There was a scholar of the law who stood up to test Jesus...He's testing Christ. What does that mean? One need look no further than our entertainment or political landscape to know what "testing" someone really means. Whenever a political figure or celebrity sits down for an interview, they are being "tested." They're being asked very specific questions with very specific syntaxes in very specific patterns. Meanwhile, the interviewees are taught to answer in very specific ways to avoid their words being misrepresented later. The last thing they want is to have their name in tomorrow's headlines because they misspoke or because someone took their words out of context.
So when the Gospel says this scholar is "testing" Jesus, it means he's trying to trip Him up. It's not that there's a right or wrong answer. The questions are deliberately vague because they want Jesus to give them specific answers, and then ridicule Him for those answers.
So this dude steps up and asks, "What must I do to inherit eternal life?"
As the audience, we may think this is the tricky part, but it's not. For a scholar of the law, he probably already knows the answer. This is more a test of Jesus' devotion to Judaism than a snare to trap Him. Jesus does what any good public figure would do and answers that question with another question. He puts the scholar on the spot and makes him answer.
You shall love the Lord, your God, with all your heart, with all your being, with all your strength, and with all your mind, and your neighbor as yourself.Think back to when you were in grade school and there was that one kid in the class that knew all the answers. That's what's happening here. Mr. Goody-Two-Shoes is reciting the answer the way a smart little brat at the front of the class would routinely answer a complicated math problem.
Jesus even gives this guy a verbal pat on the back, and we think we're done here when Teacher's Pet decides to go for the kill and asks,
And who is my neighbor?For those of you just joining us, this is the real test. You can almost hear him snickering to his pack of equally obnoxious friends as they wait for Jesus to answer. Meanwhile, all the elders are looking at each other like, "Oh, snap!"
See, in the tradition of the Jewish faith, God's favor fell to the Jews and the Jews alone. They were God's "Chosen People," and anyone outside of their tribal circles wasn't just unlucky, but unclean. They were to be avoided and spurned. They were damned by virtue of their race.
Then here comes that Jesus we've heard so much about: making trouble dining with sinners, healing the sick, raising the dead, and (gasp!) even forgiving the sins of such evildoers as tax collectors and prostitutes! What is this world coming to?
So when 10 o'clock Scholar asks Jesus who his neighbor is, what he's really waiting for is Jesus to tell him who his neighbor isn't so they have something to spin against him. In some ways, Jesus is in a corner with no clear way out: if He says "the faithful are your neighbor," He's discriminating against the sinners He Himself has saved. If He says, "the sinners are your neighbor," He could appear to be directly opposing the faith He professes to uphold.
Jesus rather brilliantly gets around this with a parable detailing how people of faith (the priest and the Levite) see a man suffering and do nothing, but the Samaritan (a race detested by the Jews) helps the man at his own expense and inconvenience.
Of the parable itself, two things should be noted.
Obviously the first is that Jesus specifically names groups of people when He is talking about those who encounter the victim. They are priests, Levites, and Samaritans. That's important because He's trying to establish that the peace offered through Him is for all people. That's the obvious take away.
The not-so-obvious part is that Jesus does not detail for His audience who the victim is, or who the assailants were. He states only that "a man fell victim to robbers." You could argue that the man was traveling from Jerusalem to Jericho and therefore may have been deemed at the time a "righteous man," but Jesus doesn't state explicitly what kind of man the traveler was. He doesn't say, "A Jew was beaten by a group of Samaritan robbers," or vice versa. He simply states what we might call, "the facts of the case."
It's also important to note that when Jesus asks the scholar which of the three passersby was a true neighbor, the scholar answers, "The one who treated him with mercy."
The scholar doesn't say, "The Samaritan." He says, "The one who treated him with mercy." This is probably more deliberate on the narrator's part (Luke) to further distance the traditional concept of "chosen people" from the concepts of righteousness and unrighteousness.
It also allows for a beautifully simple and powerful answer from Christ: "Go and do likewise." It's a direct answer that leaves no room for refute or debate.
This is incredibly timely for us here in America and around the world where tragedies seem to draw lines between groups and races across the country and the world. All you have to do is look at Facebook, Twitter, or watch the news to see that everyone has an opinion on the issues that plague our society. Most of them are no more than canned catchphrases that people can put on bumper stickers or on banners to catch others' attention. They tend to lean entirely one way or entirely the other.
The words of this Gospel passage are a reminder to stop looking at ourselves as belonging to one camp or the other. We are not different races. We are the human race. We are not children of the light or dark. We are children of God. And while that may sound just as shallow as some of the views we scroll past every day, if we really take the time to let those ideas sink in, we can start the process of divorcing ourselves from the labels we've placed on each other and start seeing Christ within one another.
It's also important not to undermine the tragic loss of life. A man who falls victim to robbers loses his money and possessions. But money can be earned or given. Possessions can be bought or bestowed. Life is not refundable. Life is precious and fleeting, and the wasting of it is not only a disgrace to the gift that God bestows on us, but a crime against everything that was possible for the life that was taken.
Think of someone you know or someone you've met. Perhaps it's someone you've harbored a prejudice against, even if you don't know why. Maybe it's because you labeled them--whether consciously or subconsciously--as something that triggers a negative connotation in your mind.
Now replace that label with "Christ":
The person is not "one of them." They are Christ.
A popular song by Joan Osborne once asked, "What if God was one of us?"
Maybe we should stop asking that and instead remind ourselves that God is all of us.
The story of the Good Samaritan teaches us that every one of us has the capacity for good; the capacity for mercy.
The story of Jesus and the scholar teaches us that the mercy we are capable of is for everyone, not just those we've labeled as "worthy."